Advertisement
Top banner ad slot - paste AdSense code here

Urgently restore public in-person dermatology services in Dunedin

Open 1,846 official signatures 📡 RSS feed

Petition request

That the House of Representatives urge the Government to restore permanent, in-person public dermatology services in Dunedin and Southern regions; acknowledge any harm caused by the lack of specialist dermatology services; and provide funding for long-term, equitable access to specialist skin care.

Why this petition

I think residents of Dunedin and the wider Southern region deserve the same access to specialist healthcare as people living elsewhere in New Zealand. I feel this current lack of locally accessible public dermatology services places an unacceptable burden on patients, families, general practitioners, and other hospital services. Severe dermatological conditions can cause chronic pain, infection, disability, and death. Delays in diagnosis can affect outcomes.

📖 Background

Click to see details

What is this about?

This petition calls for the New Zealand Government to restore permanent, in-person public dermatology services in Dunedin and the Southern region. Dermatology is the branch of medicine dealing with skin, hair, and nail conditions. The petitioners argue that residents currently lack local access to these specialists, forcing them to travel long distances or wait for private care.

Current Situation

Public specialist healthcare in New Zealand is generally provided through District Health Boards (now Te Whatu Ora) and public hospitals. In recent years, several regional centres have seen reductions or closures of specific specialist clinics, including dermatology. In Dunedin, patients have reported significant delays in accessing specialist skin care. This has led to a situation where many residents must travel to Christchurch or Auckland for consultations, or seek expensive private treatment. The petition highlights that this gap places a heavy burden on General Practitioners (GPs), who often manage complex skin conditions without specialist support.

Arguments in Favour

  • Equity of Access: Residents in the South Island should have the same access to specialist care as those in the North Island.
  • Health Outcomes: Delays in diagnosing skin conditions can lead to worse health outcomes, including chronic pain, infection, and in severe cases, cancer progression.
  • System Burden: Lack of local specialists increases pressure on GPs and emergency departments, as patients seek urgent care for conditions that could be managed by a dermatologist.
  • Cost Savings: Early diagnosis and local treatment may reduce long-term healthcare costs associated with advanced disease management.

Arguments Against or Challenges

  • Resource Allocation: The government faces budget constraints and must balance specialist services across the entire country. Restoring services in one region may require diverting funds from other areas.
  • Workforce Shortages: There is a national shortage of dermatologists. Even if funding is provided, there may not be enough qualified specialists available to staff new clinics immediately.
  • Telehealth Alternatives: Some argue that telehealth (video consultations) can provide specialist advice without the need for physical travel, though this does not replace the need for in-person biopsies or procedures.

Relevant Context

Specialist healthcare in New Zealand is funded by the government and delivered through the public hospital system. Recent years have seen ongoing discussions about the sustainability of public health services and the impact of workforce shortages. The Southern region, including Dunedin, has historically had fewer specialist services compared to major North Island cities. Patients affected include those with chronic skin diseases, suspected skin cancers, and other complex dermatological conditions. The petition seeks a formal government response and funding commitment to address this specific regional gap.

Sign on parliament.nz →

Community verdict

7 support · 3 oppose

⚔ Battles (7 days each)

winner: Wiremu Paki
👍 ForWiremu Paki
Travel to Christchurch is not just a bus fare. It is a day off work, childcare, and often an overnight stay for people who are already unwell. Southern patients deserve the same standard of care as people in the North Island.
1 votes
1 : 0
👎 AgainstNikau Henare
Everyone wants better access, but we cannot invent dermatologists. The shortage is national. A permanent in-person service needs a realistic staffing plan, not just a press release. I would rather see stable telehealth and visiting clinics than a service that opens and closes again.
0 votes

Community arguments

👍 For Megan Rutherford 20 Oct 2026
I live in South Dunedin and waited five months for a dermatology appointment, then had to travel to Christchurch twice for follow-ups. A skin condition is not cosmetic — it affects sleep, work and mental health. Dunedin needs permanent in-person specialists, not another temporary clinic.
👎 Against Mike J. 20 Oct 2026
I have used telehealth for a skin issue and it was quick and effective. Travelling to Dunedin is not necessary for every appointment. We should invest in the virtual service instead of rebuilding a clinic that may not be sustainable.
👍 For Anna P. 20 Oct 2026
Older patients often cannot manage repeated trips to Christchurch. Restoring in-person clinics in Dunedin is basic equity, not a luxury.
👍 For Claire Bennett 19 Oct 2026
My father's melanoma was found late because the referral pathway kept bouncing between his GP and the hospital. Earlier in-person review in Dunedin might have changed his outcome. This is about lives, not convenience.
👍 For Eden Grant 19 Oct 2026
I am a practice nurse and I see how much time is spent chasing referrals. A permanent local service would reduce duplication and let GPs get advice sooner.
👍 For Hana K. 18 Oct 2026
Follow-up matters. A one-off video appointment is not enough for conditions that need biopsies, light therapy or regular monitoring. We need continuity in the city where people live.
👎 Against Rebecca Lim 18 Oct 2026
This petition ignores opportunity cost. Every extra dollar for one specialty is a dollar not spent elsewhere in a stretched hospital. We should evaluate whether in-person care actually improves outcomes compared with a well-resourced regional telehealth model.
👍 For Mei L. 18 Oct 2026
Skin cancer is common in New Zealand and the South has an older population. Cutting in-person dermatology is a false economy when late diagnosis costs the system far more.
👍 For Priyanka Nair 17 Oct 2026
As a medical student, I have seen how quickly a service disappears when it relies on goodwill and temporary funding. Permanent staffing is the only way to protect training and patient care.
👍 For Liam O. 17 Oct 2026
We train excellent doctors here. If there is no permanent service, we lose the teaching and supervision capacity that keeps specialists in the region.
👎 Against Dan C. 17 Oct 2026
Is the demand really there for a full in-person service in Dunedin? The petition gives no data on referral volumes or unmet need. We need evidence before committing permanent funding.
👍 For Aroha T. 16 Oct 2026
My tamariki has severe eczema and we have been on the waitlist for months. Telehealth helps for a quick check, but it cannot properly assess widespread skin disease or fit us for the treatment we need.
👎 Against Nikau Henare 16 Oct 2026
Everyone wants better access, but we cannot invent dermatologists. The shortage is national. A permanent in-person service needs a realistic staffing plan, not just a press release. I would rather see stable telehealth and visiting clinics than a service that opens and closes again.
👍 For Rewa J. 16 Oct 2026
Dunedin is a university city with a hospital. The idea that we cannot sustain dermatology here is hard to believe. The community has been asking for years; it is time to fund it properly.
👍 For Priya S. 15 Oct 2026
I work with rural patients in Southland. Some have no transport and no reliable broadband for video calls. An in-person service in Dunedin is the closest realistic option for them.
👍 For Jaxon Baker 15 Oct 2026
I have driven family members to appointments in Christchurch because there was no other option. The cost and stress add up. Restore the service and stop making illness a travel problem.
👍 For Tane R. 14 Oct 2026
Maori and Pacific patients already face longer waits and worse outcomes. Removing local specialist care widens a gap the health system keeps saying it wants to close.
👍 For Wiremu Paki 14 Oct 2026
Travel to Christchurch is not just a bus fare. It is a day off work, childcare, and often an overnight stay for people who are already unwell. Southern patients deserve the same standard of care as people in the North Island.
👍 For Jade F. 13 Oct 2026
I have had severe acne scarring and hidradenitis for years. Being seen locally made it possible to keep a job and stay in treatment. Losing that service would be devastating for people like me.
👎 Against Tom W. 13 Oct 2026
Dermatology is one of the specialties where images and video work reasonably well for triage. A hybrid model would help more people than concentrating resources in one city. The petition is too focused on buildings and not enough on outcomes.
👍 For Sarah M. 13 Oct 2026
GPs are doing their best, but suspicious lesions need a specialist's eyes and equipment. The current wait times put enormous pressure on primary care and on patients who keep being told to "watch it".
👎 Against David K. 12 Oct 2026
The request says "restore" and "permanent" but gives no costings or workforce plan. Parliament cannot simply will specialists into existence. I support better access, but this petition overpromises.
👍 For James W. 12 Oct 2026
The dermatology workforce is stretched everywhere, but that does not justify leaving Dunedin without a permanent service. Rotating visiting clinics are a patch, not a plan.
Advertisement
Sidebar / footer ad slot - paste AdSense code here