Advertisement
Top banner ad slot - paste AdSense code here

Recognise Tourette Syndrome as a government-funded disability in Aotearoa

Open 34,326 official signatures 📡 RSS feed

Petition request

That the House of Representatives recognise Tourette Syndrome (TS) as a standalone government-supported disability by allowing those with Tourette Syndrome (TS) access to government-funded disability support services.

Why this petition

Tourette Syndrome is recognised as a disability under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. I feel that the rights of people with TS should be upheld. Tics can impact one’s ability to participate in society, affect family, and cause physical damage to the home. I believe people living with TS deserve access to disability support to enjoy an improved quality of life. This petition request is supported by the Tourette’s Association of New Zealand and Uncle Tics.

📖 Background

Click to see details

What is the Topic?

This petition asks the New Zealand Government to officially classify Tourette Syndrome (TS) as a standalone disability for the purpose of accessing specific government-funded support services. TS is a neurological condition characterized by involuntary movements or sounds called tics. These can be simple (like blinking) or complex (like jumping or making sounds). The petitioners argue that because tics can cause physical harm or social difficulties, people with TS should have direct access to disability support funding, similar to those with other recognized conditions.

Current Situation in New Zealand

Currently, New Zealand does not have a single, universal "disability register" that automatically grants funding. Instead, access to support depends on the specific service. For example, the Disability Support Services (DSS) program provides funding for home modifications and equipment, but eligibility is assessed case-by-case based on individual needs and severity. People with TS may currently qualify for some support if their tics cause significant functional impairment, but they often face barriers in proving this need or navigating the assessment process. The petition exists because advocates feel the current system is inconsistent and that TS is not always recognized as a distinct condition requiring specific support pathways.

Arguments in Favour

  • International Standards: The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities recognizes TS as a disability. Supporters argue New Zealand should align its domestic policies with this international commitment.
  • Quality of Life: Tics can cause physical injury, damage property, and lead to social isolation. Direct access to funding could help with home modifications, therapy, or assistive devices.
  • Clarity and Equity: A standalone recognition would remove ambiguity for assessors, ensuring people with TS are not denied support due to a lack of understanding about the condition.

Arguments Against or Concerns

  • Resource Allocation: The government may argue that funding is limited and should be directed based on individual functional needs rather than a specific diagnosis. A blanket recognition could strain the budget without guaranteeing that every person with TS needs the same level of support.
  • Existing Frameworks: Critics might point out that the current case-by-case assessment system is designed to target resources where they are most needed, and that changing the classification could complicate the existing disability support framework.
  • Definition of Disability: Some argue that not all people with TS experience tics severe enough to constitute a disability in the functional sense, and that a standalone label might stigmatize those with milder symptoms.

Relevant Context

The Tourette’s Association of New Zealand and the charity Uncle Tics support this petition. In New Zealand, disability support is primarily administered by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) through the DSS program. There is no single law that lists all recognized disabilities; instead, eligibility is determined by functional impact. This petition seeks to change how TS is categorized within that existing system to ensure consistent access to support.

Sign on parliament.nz →

Community verdict

11 support · 11 oppose

⚔ Battles (7 days each)

winner: Tane R.
👍 ForTane R.
Spend an hour with someone who has severe tics and the 'it's not a real disability' idea falls apart. This isn't about being a bit quirky — it's about a neurological condition that can be debilitating.
4 votes
4 : 3
👎 AgainstAnna P.
One severe case doesn't establish that the condition generally meets the disability threshold. Policy has to be based on population-level data, not individual stories.
3 votes
winner: Mike J.
👍 ForMike J.
Without recognition, every application is assessed case-by-case, and the outcome depends on which assessor you get. A clear classification removes that postcode lottery.
5 votes
5 : 2
👎 AgainstSam L.
If we recognise every condition that has severe cases, the disability category becomes meaningless. The line has to be drawn somewhere, and it's not obvious that Tourette's crosses it.
2 votes
winner: James W.
👍 ForSarah M.
Tourette's isn't a choice, a phase, or a behavioural problem — it's a neurological condition that affects every part of daily life. Recognising it as a disability isn't special treatment; it's acknowledging reality so people can access the support they're entitled to.
2 votes
2 : 4
👎 AgainstJames W.
Plenty of neurological conditions aren't classified as disabilities because they don't substantially limit daily functioning. The question is whether Tourette's meets that threshold, not whether it's neurological.
4 votes

Community arguments

👍 For Aroha T. 16 Oct 2026
My son was diagnosed at seven. The tics are exhausting, the social isolation is worse, and the current system treats him like he's misbehaving rather than managing a condition he didn't choose. Disability recognition would change everything for families like ours.
👍 For Sarah M. 15 Oct 2026
Tourette's isn't a choice, a phase, or a behavioural problem — it's a neurological condition that affects every part of daily life. Recognising it as a disability isn't special treatment; it's acknowledging reality so people can access the support they're entitled to.
👎 Against James W. 14 Oct 2026
Plenty of neurological conditions aren't classified as disabilities because they don't substantially limit daily functioning. The question is whether Tourette's meets that threshold, not whether it's neurological.
👍 For Ngaire D. 14 Oct 2026
I've worked in disability support for fifteen years, and the families I see with Tourette's are among the most exhausted — not because the condition is the worst, but because they have to fight for every bit of help. Recognition would end that fight.
👍 For Hana K. 13 Oct 2026
Without recognition, every application is assessed case-by-case, and the outcome depends on which assessor you get. A clear classification would remove that postcode lottery.
👍 For Ngaire D. 12 Oct 2026
The 'where does the money come from' question is the right one to ask, but it's not an argument against recognition — it's an argument for proper funding. We don't refuse to build schools because they cost money; we fund them. Tourette's support should be budgeted like any other disability service.
👍 For Rohini P. 11 Oct 2026
Disability support is underfunded across the board, but that's a reason to fix the system, not to deny people with Tourette's their classification. We don't deny people with other conditions because the system is underfunded.
👍 For Mike J. 10 Oct 2026
Without recognition, every application is assessed case-by-case, and the outcome depends on which assessor you get. A clear classification removes that postcode lottery.
👎 Against Sam L. 9 Oct 2026
If we recognise every condition that has severe cases, the disability category becomes meaningless. The line has to be drawn somewhere, and it's not obvious that Tourette's crosses it.
👍 For Dan C. 9 Oct 2026
Tourette's is one of the most misunderstood conditions out there — people hear 'swearing tic' and think it's a joke. Recognition would force the system to take it seriously, which is the first step toward proper support.
👍 For Tom W. 8 Oct 2026
The functional impact varies enormously — some people with Tourette's have mild tics that don't affect their lives, others can't work, can't socialise, can't function. Recognition doesn't mean everyone gets the same support; it means everyone gets assessed fairly.
👍 For Kahu W. 7 Oct 2026
A blanket exclusion hurts the people with severe Tourette's who need help the most. A proper assessment process is exactly what recognition provides.
👍 For Mei L. 6 Oct 2026
Disability isn't binary — it's a spectrum. The current system already recognises conditions that affect some people severely and others mildly. Tourette's fits that pattern.
👍 For Priya S. 5 Oct 2026
I'm a teacher, and I've seen students with Tourette's punished for tics they can't control. Recognition wouldn't just help families access support — it would force schools to treat these students fairly instead of as behaviour problems.
👍 For Tane R. 5 Oct 2026
Spend an hour with someone who has severe tics and the 'it's not a real disability' idea falls apart. This isn't about being a bit quirky — it's about a neurological condition that can be debilitating.
👎 Against Anna P. 4 Oct 2026
One severe case doesn't establish that the condition generally meets the disability threshold. Policy has to be based on population-level data, not individual stories.
👎 Against Zoe S. 3 Oct 2026
Every new disability category adds permanent cost to a system that's already struggling. Once you recognise Tourette's, you can't un-ring that bell — the funding commitment is forever, and it comes from somewhere.
👎 Against Jade F. 2 Oct 2026
Plenty of misunderstood conditions aren't disabilities. The question is functional impact, not public awareness.
👎 Against Mana P. 1 Oct 2026
Better teacher training and school policy could fix the school problem without reclassifying the condition.
👍 For Rewa J. 30 Sept 2026
Disability recognition is what gives schools the legal framework to make reasonable adjustments. Without it, parents are begging for basic accommodations that should be automatic.
👍 For Daniel Rangi 30 Sept 2026
People with Tourette's who get proper support are more likely to stay in work, contribute to the economy, and not need more expensive crisis interventions later. Recognition isn't just a cost; it's an investment.
👎 Against Finn Walker 29 Sept 2026
Every dollar spent on Tourette's support is a dollar not spent on something else. The question isn't whether it's a good idea in theory — it's whether it's the best use of limited disability funding right now.
👍 For Kiri N. 28 Sept 2026
Recognition isn't just about funding, it's about rights. Without it, people with Tourette's have no standing to demand the adjustments they need.
👎 Against Cathy Yu 27 Aug 2026
i am aginst this bec ause i dopnt like having my tax money going to opeople whos problem is just shakey shakey
Advertisement
Sidebar / footer ad slot - paste AdSense code here