Advertisement
Top banner ad slot - paste AdSense code here

Stop using 1080!

Open 1,533 official signatures 📡 RSS feed

Petition request

That the House of Representatives put an end to the use of 1080 poison.

Why this petition

It is a killer of both native fauna and targeted species. I believe NZ’s population has been sub-lethally poisoned with 1080 for decades and the information from government agencies about its breakdown being harmless is incorrect. When 1080 is added to water it dilutes but the toxic fluoroacetate molecule remains intact along with its toxic metabolite fluorocitrate. Hidden from public view many innocent animals will die slowly and in agony after consuming 1080 pellets. This is inhumane!

📖 Background

Click to see details

What is 1080?

1080 is the common name for sodium fluoroacetate, a highly toxic chemical used as a poison. It is not a biological agent but a synthetic compound. When ingested, it interferes with the body’s energy production, causing organ failure. In New Zealand, it is primarily used in bait pellets to control invasive mammal pests, specifically possums, rats, and stoats, which threaten native birds and ecosystems.

Current Situation in New Zealand

The use of 1080 is a long-standing and contentious issue in New Zealand conservation. The Department of Conservation (DOC) and regional councils have used it for decades in large-scale aerial and ground-based operations to protect native species like the kiwi, kaka, and kakapo from predation. The petition reflects ongoing public debate regarding the ethics of using a broad-spectrum poison versus other control methods. Recent environmental reviews and public consultations have kept this topic in the news, with some communities expressing concern over non-target animal deaths and environmental persistence.

Arguments in Favour of the Petition

  • Animal Welfare: Critics argue that 1080 causes slow, painful deaths in non-target native animals, such as bats, lizards, and birds, which are not the intended targets.
  • Environmental Persistence: Petitioners claim that the chemical does not break down harmlessly in water, potentially contaminating waterways and affecting aquatic life.
  • Human Health Concerns: Some argue that long-term low-level exposure poses risks to human health, challenging government assurances of safety.

Arguments Against the Petition

  • Effectiveness: According to DOC, 1080 is currently the most effective tool for controlling possum and rat populations at the scale required to save endangered native species. Alternatives, such as traps or other poisons, are often less effective or more costly.
  • Regulated Use: The use of 1080 is strictly regulated under the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act. Operations require environmental impact assessments and strict monitoring to minimize non-target deaths.
  • Scientific Consensus: Government agencies, including the Ministry for the Environment, state that when used correctly, 1080 breaks down quickly in the environment and poses minimal risk to human health or water supplies.

Relevant Context

The decision to use 1080 is typically made by local councils and DOC based on specific pest control plans. It is not a single national mandate but a tool used in various regions. The debate often centers on balancing the urgent need to protect New Zealand’s unique biodiversity against the ethical concerns of using a lethal chemical. Recent years have seen increased investment in alternative methods, such as biosecurity and biological controls, but 1080 remains a central part of current pest management strategies.

Sign on parliament.nz →

Community verdict

1 support · 0 oppose

Community arguments

👍 For Will Thompson 14 Oct 2026
Dropping poison from helicopters into forests we're trying to save is a policy that sounds decisive and works accidentally. Non-target species die, the ecological cost is barely measured, and we keep doing it because the alternative requires admitting we don't have one.
👎 Against Sophie Anderson 14 Oct 2026
The 'non-target species die' claim is technically true and practically irrelevant — every predator control method kills non-targets, including the trapping you'd replace it with. What actually matters is whether the native species you're trying to save survive better than the alternative allows.
Advertisement
Sidebar / footer ad slot - paste AdSense code here