Advertisement
Top banner ad slot - paste AdSense code here

Require custodial sentence when drug-impaired actions result in death

Open 986 official signatures 📡 RSS feed

Petition request

That the House of Representatives amend the Sentencing Act 2002 to require a custodial sentence, rather than home detention, for convicted individuals whose drug-impaired actions result in the death of another person; and note that 8,611 people have signed a similar online petition.

Why this petition

Ella-Rose Donker and Madison Chamberlain’s lives were tragically taken by car drivers whose behaviour was affected by drugs. Both of these events should never have happened. Both events have left behind devastated families who are grieving, angry and frustrated. I think the loss of a life warrants a penalty that reflects the seriousness of the offence and provides greater accountability. Ella & Madi’s Law is a campaign pushing to strengthen sentences for drugged drivers who cause fatal crashes.

📖 Background

Click to see details

What the Topic Is

This petition asks the New Zealand Parliament to change the Sentencing Act 2002. Specifically, it seeks to make it illegal for judges to give home detention (a non-custodial sentence where the offender stays at home under electronic monitoring) to anyone convicted of causing a death while under the influence of drugs. Instead, the petitioners want the law to require a custodial sentence, which means the offender must serve time in prison.

Current Situation and Prompt

The petition is driven by the "Ella & Madi’s Law" campaign, following the tragic deaths of Ella-Rose Donker and Madison Chamberlain. Both young women were killed by drivers who were impaired by drugs. The families of the victims argue that current sentencing options do not adequately reflect the severity of these crimes, leading to public frustration and a demand for stricter accountability. According to the petition text, over 8,600 people have signed similar online calls for this change.

Arguments in Favour

  • Proportionality: Supporters argue that taking a life is a serious crime that warrants a penalty reflecting its gravity. They believe home detention is too lenient for fatal drug-impaired driving.
  • Accountability: A mandatory prison sentence is seen as a clearer signal of societal condemnation and greater accountability for the offender.
  • Deterrence: Stricter, predictable penalties may discourage others from driving under the influence of drugs.

Arguments Against

  • Judicial Discretion: Legal experts often argue that judges need the flexibility to consider all circumstances of a case, including the offender’s background, remorse, and specific level of impairment, rather than having a rigid rule applied automatically.
  • Effectiveness: Critics may argue that mandatory minimums do not necessarily reduce crime rates and can lead to inconsistent justice if they ignore mitigating factors.
  • Prison Capacity: There are ongoing concerns in New Zealand about prison overcrowding and the cost of incarceration versus rehabilitation-focused sentences.

Relevant Context

New Zealand already has strict laws against driving under the influence. The Land Transport Act 1998 sets high penalties for drug-impaired driving. However, sentencing for resulting deaths is governed by the Sentencing Act 2002, which allows judges to choose between prison and home detention based on the specific facts of the case. Home detention is a common sentence in New Zealand for many non-violent and some violent offences, intended to reduce prison populations and support rehabilitation. This petition highlights a specific tension between public expectation for severe punishment for fatal accidents and the legal system’s current approach to balancing punishment with rehabilitation.

Sign on parliament.nz →

Community verdict

3 support · 4 oppose

⚔ Battles (7 days each)

winner: Mei L.
👍 ForKahu W.
Families of the victims have watched offenders walk with home detention after taking a life while impaired. A presumptive custodial sentence doesn't remove discretion; it just stops the headline cases.
3 votes
3 : 4
👎 AgainstMei L.
I understand the concern, but this approach could have unintended consequences. We need to think this through more carefully.
4 votes
tie
👍 ForTane R.
This petition addresses a real issue. That the House of Representatives amend the Sentencing Act 2... is something Parliament should take seriously.
2 votes
2 : 2
👎 AgainstJames W.
I respect that view, but you're ignoring the economic cost. Show me the numbers - not just sentiment.
2 votes

Community arguments

👍 For Kahu W. 19 Sept 2026
Families of the victims have watched offenders walk with home detention after taking a life while impaired. A presumptive custodial sentence doesn't remove discretion; it just stops the headline cases.
👎 Against James W. 28 Aug 2026
I respect that view, but you're ignoring the economic cost. Show me the numbers - not just sentiment.
👍 For Leila A. 23 Aug 2026
Important for New Zealand's future. We need to start these conversations now rather than later.
👍 For Tane R. 22 Aug 2026
This petition addresses a real issue. That the House of Representatives amend the Sentencing Act 2... is something Parliament should take seriously.
👎 Against Tom W. 20 Aug 2026
I'm not convinced the petition fully considers the costs and trade-offs involved. Let's look at the evidence first.
Advertisement
Sidebar / footer ad slot - paste AdSense code here