Advertisement
Top banner ad slot - paste AdSense code here

Require builders of new houses to provide a minimum of 2 car parks

Open 111 official signatures 📡 RSS feed

Petition request

That the House of Representatives require builders of new houses to provide a minimum of 2 car parks on the houses’ own land area.

Why this petition

Being either a buyer or a tenant for a new house, we often see that almost all new houses do not even provide a single carpark in their own land areas, but instead ask buyers or tenants to park on the streets. We also think that the parking should be explained in home advertisements and listings. In our opinion, having car park spaces within people’s own boundaries could help avoid hit and run cases. We think it could also allow people to drive more safely and reach their destinations faster.

📖 Background

Click to see details

What This Petition Is About

This petition asks the New Zealand Parliament to pass a law requiring builders of new homes to include space for at least two cars on the property itself. Currently, many new houses are built on smaller plots where there is no dedicated driveway or garage. Instead, residents must park their vehicles on the public street. The petitioners also want car parking availability to be clearly stated in property advertisements.

Current Situation in New Zealand

Urban housing in New Zealand has shifted towards higher density and smaller land sizes, particularly in cities like Auckland, Wellington, and Christchurch. According to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE), there is a significant housing shortage, which has driven developers to maximize the number of homes per hectare. This often results in "car-light" or "car-free" designs where on-site parking is omitted to save space for more dwellings. Consequently, many new residents rely on street parking, which can lead to congestion and disputes between neighbors.

Arguments in Favour

  • Reduced Street Congestion: If cars are parked on private land, fewer vehicles occupy public roads, potentially easing traffic flow in residential areas.
  • Safety and Security: Parking on private property may reduce the risk of vehicle damage, theft, or hit-and-run incidents compared to street parking.
  • Consumer Clarity: Requiring parking details in listings helps buyers and renters make informed decisions about their daily commute and storage needs.

Arguments Against

  • Housing Affordability: Mandating two car parks requires larger land areas or specific design layouts. This increases construction costs, which are typically passed on to buyers, making new homes more expensive and less accessible.
  • Urban Density Goals: Many local councils and the central government encourage higher-density housing to address the housing crisis. Requiring large driveways reduces the number of homes that can be built on a given plot, potentially worsening the housing shortage.
  • Changing Transport Trends: There is a growing national push to reduce car dependency in favor of public transport, cycling, and walking. Mandating car spaces may contradict long-term sustainability and urban planning goals.
  • One-Size-Fits-All Approach: Not all households own two cars. Single-person households or those with strong public transport access may not need two spaces, making the mandate inefficient.

Relevant Context

Local councils currently have the power to set parking requirements through their District Plans. Some councils already mandate specific parking ratios, while others are moving towards minimum or zero parking requirements to encourage sustainable transport. A national law would override these local decisions, creating a uniform standard across the country. This issue affects homebuyers, renters, developers, and local government planners who are balancing housing supply with urban liveability.

Sign on parliament.nz →

Community verdict

2 support · 1 oppose

⚔ Battles (7 days each)

winner: Tane R.
👍 ForMei L.
With the cost of living crisis, families need practical homes with parking, not tiny units that push cars onto already overcrowded streets.
1 votes
1 : 3
👎 AgainstTane R.
We tried something similar in [2019/2020] and it didn't work then. What makes you think it'll work now?
3 votes

Community arguments

👍 For Mei L. 28 Aug 2026
With the cost of living crisis, families need practical homes with parking, not tiny units that push cars onto already overcrowded streets.
👎 Against James W. 26 Aug 2026
Better public transport is the answer, not forcing developers to build car infrastructure.
👎 Against Tane R. 24 Aug 2026
We tried something similar in [2019/2020] and it didn't work then. What makes you think it'll work now?
👎 Against Sam L. 22 Aug 2026
The market should decide parking, not government mandates. Some people don't own cars - why should they pay for parking they don't use?
👍 For Aroha T. 20 Aug 2026
Try visiting any new development in Auckland - no parking, streets clogged, neighbours fighting over spots. This needs fixing.
Advertisement
Sidebar / footer ad slot - paste AdSense code here