Advertisement
Top banner ad slot - paste AdSense code here

Remove income tax and tax assets over $10 million

Open 9 official signatures 📡 RSS feed

Petition request

That the House of Representatives remove personal income tax and instead apply a 2% levy to the portion of wealth a person has above a $10 million threshold, based on the total value of what a person owns (including property, land, shares, and private business valuations).

Why this petition

My proposal intends to fund public services (public housing, education, healthcare/mental health, welfare system, teachers, nurses, doctors etc) and to end poverty and inequality. #taxwealthnotwork

📖 Background

Click to see details

What the Petition Proposes

This petition suggests a radical overhaul of New Zealand’s tax system. It asks Parliament to abolish personal income tax (the tax paid on wages and salaries) and replace it with a 2% annual levy on personal wealth exceeding $10 million. This "wealth tax" would apply to the total value of assets, including homes, land, shares, and private business interests. The goal is to fund public services like healthcare, education, and housing, aiming to reduce poverty and inequality.

Current Situation and Context

New Zealand currently relies heavily on income tax, Goods and Services Tax (GST), and corporate tax to fund government operations. Recent years have seen public debate over the cost of living, housing affordability, and the adequacy of welfare support. While the government has introduced various measures to address housing and mental health, critics argue that the current tax structure disproportionately burdens middle-income workers while allowing significant wealth to accumulate with relatively low effective tax rates. This petition reflects a growing sentiment among some citizens that the tax system should target accumulated wealth rather than earned income.

Arguments in Favour

  • Equity: Supporters argue that taxing wealth is fairer than taxing work, as it targets those with the most resources rather than those earning a living wage.
  • Revenue for Services: A 2% levy on high-net-worth individuals could generate significant revenue to fund essential public services without raising taxes on ordinary workers.
  • Reducing Inequality: By reducing the gap between the wealthy and the rest of the population, proponents believe this system could help end poverty and improve social mobility.

Arguments Against

  • Economic Distortion: Economists often warn that wealth taxes can discourage investment and entrepreneurship, potentially slowing economic growth.
  • Valuation Difficulties: Accurately valuing private businesses, unique properties, and illiquid assets is complex and costly for the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) to administer.
  • Capital Flight: There is a risk that high-net-worth individuals may move their assets or residency overseas to avoid the new levy, reducing the intended revenue.
  • Impact on Small Businesses: Including private business valuations in the tax base could penalize small business owners who have built wealth through their own enterprises, potentially making it harder for them to reinvest or expand.

Key Considerations

Any change to the tax system requires legislative approval by the House of Representatives. While the petition highlights concerns about inequality and public funding, the practical implementation of a wealth tax faces significant technical and political hurdles. Voters should consider how such a shift might affect local businesses, housing markets, and the overall stability of New Zealand’s economy.

Sign on parliament.nz →

⚔ Battles (7 days each)

tie
👍 ForMalachi Reid
We already tax work and exempt wealth. That's like charging rent for the factory floor and nothing for the vault. A 2% levy above $10 million doesn't touch a single house in South Auckland — it's the land bankers and share portfolios that finally pay something.
2 votes
2 : 2
👎 AgainstJade F.
The factory floor is where the wealth is actually created; the vault is where it's already been taxed on the way in. And "$10 million" only sounds like tycoons until you count a family farm, a lifetime's KiwiSaver, or a business valued on paper — assets that produce no cash to pay a levy with. A tax you can only satisfy by selling the asset isn't a tax on the rich; it's a tax on anyone who owns anything.
2 votes

Community arguments

👍 For Malachi Reid 13 Oct 2026
We already tax work and exempt wealth. That's like charging rent for the factory floor and nothing for the vault. A 2% levy above $10 million doesn't touch a single house in South Auckland — it's the land bankers and share portfolios that finally pay something.
👎 Against Jade F. 13 Oct 2026
The factory floor is where the wealth is actually created; the vault is where it's already been taxed on the way in. And "$10 million" only sounds like tycoons until you count a family farm, a lifetime's KiwiSaver, or a business valued on paper — assets that produce no cash to pay a levy with. A tax you can only satisfy by selling the asset isn't a tax on the rich; it's a tax on anyone who owns anything.
👍 For Hana K. 13 Oct 2026
The "capital flight" argument assumes the wealthy would rather leave their community than pay 2%. If that's the choice they make, it tells you exactly how much they valued being here.
👎 Against James W. 12 Oct 2026
A 2% levy on unrealised assets means people could owe tax on paper wealth they can't liquidate — a farm, a business. You'd create forced sales and bankruptcies for asset-rich, cash-poor New Zealanders.
Advertisement
Sidebar / footer ad slot - paste AdSense code here