Urge the Government to recognise Khalistan as a separate independent nation

Open 21 official signatures 📡 RSS feed

Petition request

That the House of Representatives urge the Government to recognise Khalistan as a separate, sovereign Sikh state; and raise this matter in the United Nations.

Why this petition

I believe that Sikhs have wanted Khalistan to be recognised as a separate nation for centuries. It is every person's right to have freedom, as well as religious and human rights. I want the NZ Government to recognise Khalistan as an independent nation from India because I believe that would enable Sikhs to live freely, safely, and without fear or unfair breach of human rights. I would like the NZ Government to also raise with the UN my view that India treats minorities like Sikhs badly.

📖 Background

Click to see details

What is Khalistan?

Khalistan refers to a proposed independent nation for the Sikh community, primarily located in the Indian state of Punjab. The term is derived from "Khal" (pool) and "istan" (place), meaning "place of the pool," referencing the holy pool at the Golden Temple in Amritsar. It is not a currently recognised country by the United Nations or any other sovereign state. The petition asks the New Zealand Government to formally recognise this proposed state and raise the issue at the UN.

Current Situation in New Zealand

New Zealand has a significant Sikh population, estimated at over 100,000 people, making it one of the largest communities in the country (per Statistics New Zealand). The petition stems from concerns among some community members regarding the safety and rights of Sikhs in India. While New Zealand maintains strong diplomatic ties with India, it does not currently recognise Khalistan. This petition is a civic action seeking a change in New Zealand’s foreign policy stance on this specific geopolitical issue.

Arguments in Favour

Human Rights: Proponents argue that recognition would pressure India to improve the treatment of Sikhs, addressing alleged violations of religious and human rights.
Self-Determination: Supporters believe that Sikhs have a historical and cultural right to self-governance and freedom from what they perceive as oppressive policies in India.
Diplomatic Leverage: Raising the issue at the UN could provide an international platform to highlight these concerns, potentially leading to greater accountability.

Arguments Against

Non-Recognition of Sovereignty: New Zealand, like most nations, only recognises states that meet international criteria for sovereignty, including control over territory and a permanent population. Khalistan does not currently meet these criteria.
Diplomatic Relations: Recognising a separatist movement within another sovereign country (India) could severely damage New Zealand-India diplomatic, trade, and security relationships.
Precedent: Recognising such entities could set a precedent for other separatist movements globally, complicating international stability and foreign policy consistency.

Relevant Context

New Zealand’s foreign policy is guided by the principle of respecting the sovereignty of other nations. The Government typically engages with India through established diplomatic channels. While the NZ Government supports human rights globally, it generally does not intervene in the internal affairs of other sovereign states unless there is a clear international mandate or crisis. The Sikh community in New Zealand is an integral part of the social fabric, and the Government is sensitive to their safety and well-being, often engaging with community leaders on broader issues of inclusion and support. This petition highlights ongoing debates within the community about the most effective ways to advocate for their rights abroad.

⚡ Cached from a previous visit

Sign on parliament.nz →

Community verdict

0 support · 3 oppose

Community arguments

👍 For Aria Thompson 7 Oct 2026

We tell ourselves we stand for human rights, but our foreign policy has always been a spreadsheet with values attached. Recognising Khalistan would cost us trade with India — and that's the only reason we won't do it. The question isn't whether it's right, it's whether we're willing to pay for being right.

👎 Against Sarah M. 6 Oct 2026

The petition asks us to recognise a nation that doesn't exist yet, based on a movement that has been linked to violence. If we start recognising aspirational states, where does it stop? Kosovo yes, Khalistan yes, what about Tibet?

👎 Against Jake M. 6 Oct 2026

I'm not saying the concerns aren't real. I'm saying that NZ recognising Khalistan wouldn't change anything in Punjab — it would just make us feel good while damaging a relationship that actually matters.