Advertisement
Top banner ad slot - paste AdSense code here

Set a speed limit of 10km/h for all e-scooters in high foot-traffic areas

Open 18 official signatures 📡 RSS feed

Petition request

That the House of Representatives urgently amend the Land Transport Act 1998 to set a strict, legally enforceable speed limit of 10 km/h for all e-scooters, including rental and private e-scooters, when operating around business shop entrances and high foot-traffic areas.

Why this petition

As a qualified counsellor and social worker, I think it is my duty to represent unheard voices and our vulnerable New Zealanders. In my opinion pedestrians should not feel unsafe, be injured, or potentially killed on our footpaths. I consider that current legislation, like the Land and Transport Act 1998 and the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004, does not sufficiently protect pedestrians from being injured. I was badly injured after being hit coming out of a dairy by an e-scooter.

📖 Background

Click to see details

What is this petition about?

This petition asks the New Zealand Parliament to change the Land Transport Act 1998. It proposes a strict legal speed limit of 10 km/h for all electric scooters (e-scooters) when they are near shop entrances or areas with many pedestrians. Currently, e-scooters are treated as bicycles under the law, meaning they generally follow the same speed rules as bikes, which do not have a specific low-speed cap for high-traffic zones.

Current Situation in New Zealand

E-scooters have become a common mode of transport in urban areas like Auckland, Wellington, and Christchurch. However, their presence on footpaths has led to increased conflicts between riders and pedestrians. The petition is prompted by safety concerns, including a specific incident where the petitioner, a social worker, was injured by an e-scooter exiting a dairy. According to the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), there has been a rise in e-scooter-related injuries in recent years, prompting public debate over current safety regulations.

Arguments in Favour

  • Pedestrian Safety: Supporters argue that 10 km/h is a safe walking speed, reducing the risk of severe injury or death if a collision occurs.
  • Legal Clarity: A specific speed limit would make enforcement easier for police and provide clear guidelines for riders.
  • Protection of Vulnerable Groups: It aims to protect children, the elderly, and people with disabilities who may be less able to avoid fast-moving vehicles on footpaths.

Arguments Against

  • Practicality and Enforcement: Critics argue that 10 km/h is too slow for e-scooters to be effective transport, potentially discouraging their use. They also question how this limit would be enforced in "high foot-traffic areas," as these zones are not always clearly defined.
  • Existing Regulations: Some argue that current rules already require riders to share space responsibly and that the issue is one of rider behaviour, not speed limits.
  • Infrastructure Gaps: Opponents suggest that the root cause is a lack of dedicated e-scooter lanes, forcing riders onto footpaths where they do not belong.

Relevant Context

Under the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004, e-scooters are classified as bicycles. This means riders must obey traffic signals and give way to pedestrians, but there is no specific statutory speed cap for e-scooters on footpaths. Local councils have the power to create local bylaws, but a national law change would apply uniformly across the country. The debate highlights a broader tension between promoting sustainable transport options and ensuring public safety in shared urban spaces.

Sign on parliament.nz →

Community arguments

👍 For Tipene Hohepa 14 Oct 2026
A 10km/h limit in a shared pedestrian zone isn't a restriction — it's the difference between a near-miss and a funeral. If you can't operate a scooter at walking pace without endangering people, the problem isn't the limit.
👎 Against Rohini P. 14 Oct 2026
This treats every rider like a reckless teenager when the real danger is a handful of idiots. A blanket cap punishes the commuter, the disability rider, and the tourist who just rented one — while doing nothing about the actual behavioural problem.
Advertisement
Sidebar / footer ad slot - paste AdSense code here