Advertisement
Top banner ad slot - paste AdSense code here

Require breast density reporting, and provide alternative imaging and screening

Open 665 official signatures 📡 RSS feed

Petition request

That the House of Representatives urge the Government to: incorporate breast density measurement into BreastScreen Aotearoa’s screening programme; make reporting on breast density mandatory; provide women who have dense breast tissue with supplemental screening, such as contrast-enhanced mammography, every 2 years.

Why this petition

Up to 10% of women have grade 4 breast density (at least 75% of their breasts is fibroglandular tissue rather than fatty tissue). These women have a 2–5-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. Their cancers can be missed because dense breast tissue and cancer both appear as white on mammograms - the tissue masks the cancer. I think if reporting of density was mandatory & alternative imaging offered, cancer could be detected in dense breasts earlier, improving outcomes & survival rates.

📖 Background

Click to see details

What the Topic Is

This petition asks the New Zealand Government to change how breast cancer screening works for women with "dense" breast tissue. Breast density refers to the amount of fibrous and glandular tissue in the breast compared to fatty tissue. On a mammogram (a breast X-ray), both dense tissue and cancer appear white. This makes it harder for doctors to spot tumors in dense breasts. The petition requests that breast density be measured and reported to all women during screening, and that those with high density receive extra tests, such as contrast-enhanced mammography, which uses a dye to make tumors stand out more clearly.

Current Situation in New Zealand

New Zealand’s national breast cancer screening program is called BreastScreen Aotearoa. It offers free mammograms to women aged 50–69 every two years. Currently, while radiologists can see density, it is not systematically measured or reported to patients as a standard part of the screening result. This petition exists because advocates argue that women with dense breasts are at higher risk and that current screening methods may miss early-stage cancers in this group.

Arguments in Favour

  • Higher Risk: Women with very dense breasts (Grade 4) have a 2–5 times higher risk of developing breast cancer compared to women with fatty breasts.
  • Better Detection: Dense tissue masks cancer on standard mammograms. Supplemental imaging could detect cancers earlier, potentially improving survival rates.
  • Informed Choice: Knowing your breast density allows women to make informed decisions about their health and seek further testing if needed.

Arguments Against

  • Cost and Resources: Adding density reporting and supplemental scans for a subset of the population would increase costs for the public health system. It is unclear if the budget can support this without reducing services elsewhere.
  • False Positives: More testing can lead to more "false alarms" (finding something that looks like cancer but isn’t), causing anxiety and unnecessary biopsies.
  • Uncertain Benefit: Some medical experts argue that the evidence for supplemental screening in average-risk women is not yet strong enough to justify a nationwide mandate, preferring to focus resources on high-risk groups.

Relevant Context

Up to 10% of women have Grade 4 breast density, meaning at least 75% of their breast tissue is dense. In other countries, such as the United States, laws have been passed requiring doctors to tell patients if their breasts are dense. New Zealand does not currently have this requirement. The petition is directed at the House of Representatives, asking them to urge the Government to update BreastScreen Aotearoa’s protocols to include mandatory density reporting and access to alternative imaging every two years for affected women.

Sign on parliament.nz →

Community verdict

14 support · 11 oppose

⚔ Battles (7 days each)

⚔ live
👍 ForSarah M.
I had a mammogram last year and was told my breasts were dense, but not what that meant. I only found out later that dense tissue can hide cancer. Mandatory reporting would have helped me ask the right questions.
1 votes
1 : 0
👎 AgainstChris B.
The cost per detected cancer may be very high. Parliament should ask for a cost-benefit analysis and a staged rollout rather than mandating the most expensive option.
0 votes

Community arguments

👎 Against Suki B. 26 Oct 2026
Dense breast reporting is worthwhile, but the petition goes too far by requiring contrast-enhanced mammography every two years. Let us start with reporting and a clinician-led pathway.
👍 For Rohini P. 26 Oct 2026
I had a scan last year and the report did not mention density at all. I had to ask. That should not depend on whether a woman knows the right question.
👎 Against Chris B. 26 Oct 2026
The cost per detected cancer may be very high. Parliament should ask for a cost-benefit analysis and a staged rollout rather than mandating the most expensive option.
👍 For Ngaire D. 26 Oct 2026
I was told my scan was clear, then found a lump myself. Only later did I learn I had dense breasts. Women need to know that a mammogram is not equally effective for everyone.
👎 Against Jade F. 26 Oct 2026
I support better information, but a blanket two-year supplemental scan could create anxiety and false positives. Risk-based screening is more responsible.
👍 For Mike J. 26 Oct 2026
BreastScreen Aotearoa should report density in plain language and tell women what their options are. That is a modest change with real informed-consent benefits.
👎 Against Tane R. 26 Oct 2026
The petition assumes contrast-enhanced mammography is freely available. In many regions it is not. Funding and workforce need to be addressed first.
👍 For Hana K. 26 Oct 2026
My mother’s cancer was missed on a mammogram because of dense tissue. By the time it was found it had spread. Earlier alternative imaging could have changed her outcome.
👎 Against Anna P. 26 Oct 2026
Mandatory reporting sounds simple, but density can change and the evidence for supplemental screening is not settled. We should not promise every two years before the data supports it.
👍 For Priya S. 25 Oct 2026
I have grade 4 density and only discovered it after a private scan. I was never told by BreastScreen. That information should be standard, not something you stumble on.
👎 Against James W. 25 Oct 2026
This would divert scarce radiology capacity from women with symptoms. A targeted pilot for the highest-risk density categories is a better first step.
👍 For Ben H. 25 Oct 2026
If dense tissue masks cancers on mammograms, then reporting density is basic informed consent. The system should not withhold information that changes a woman’s screening choices.
👎 Against Mei L. 25 Oct 2026
Breast density reporting is useful, but contrast-enhanced mammography carries risks and is not suitable for everyone. Clinicians should decide who needs supplemental screening.
👍 For Aroha T. 25 Oct 2026
After my scan, I was told I had dense breasts but there was no follow-up pathway. I paid privately for an ultrasound because I was worried. Women deserve clear information and an alternative.
👎 Against David K. 25 Oct 2026
The petition raises a real gap, but adding contrast-enhanced mammography every two years would be very expensive. We need a funded plan before making it a universal entitlement.
👍 For Sarah M. 25 Oct 2026
I had a mammogram last year and was told my breasts were dense, but not what that meant. I only found out later that dense tissue can hide cancer. Mandatory reporting would have helped me ask the right questions.
Advertisement
Sidebar / footer ad slot - paste AdSense code here