Advertisement
Top banner ad slot - paste AdSense code here

Referendum on any proposed sale of public assets

Open 136 official signatures 📡 RSS feed

Petition request

That the House of Representatives require a nationwide referendum before any Government can permanently sell or transfer ownership of publicly owned strategic assets, including State-owned enterprises, electricity assets, rail infrastructure and all public land.

Why this petition

Public assets are funded by New Zealanders and I think should be held for the benefit of current and future generations. When properly managed, I believe these assets can provide ongoing income and value to the country. Although legislation allows elected Governments to sell major public assets in certain circumstances, I think this should change. Governments are elected for limited terms and in my view should not permanently dispose of national assets without public consent.

📖 Background

Click to see details

What is the Topic?

This petition calls for a mandatory nationwide vote (referendum) before the government can permanently sell or transfer ownership of major public assets. "Public assets" here refers to state-owned enterprises (businesses owned by the government, like Air New Zealand or Callaghan Gas), electricity infrastructure, rail networks, and public land. The core request is to prevent any future government from selling these assets without first asking the entire country to approve the sale.

Current Situation in New Zealand

New Zealand has a history of privatizing state assets, most notably during the 1980s and 1990s. Currently, the government holds ownership of several major entities, including the state-owned enterprise Air New Zealand (partially owned) and the Crown’s stake in Callaghan Gas. The petition arises from concerns that elected governments, serving only three-year terms, may make long-term decisions that lock in future generations into a loss of national wealth. Recent debates around the management of state assets and the potential sale of remaining state stakes have fueled public interest in ensuring democratic control over these decisions.

Arguments in Favour

  • Intergenerational Equity: Public assets are funded by taxpayers and should benefit future generations, not just the current electorate.
  • Democratic Consent: Major, irreversible financial decisions should require direct public approval rather than being decided solely by a temporary political majority.
  • Asset Value: Properly managed public assets can provide ongoing income and strategic value to the country.

Arguments Against

  • Government Flexibility: Governments need the ability to make swift economic decisions, including restructuring or selling assets, to respond to changing market conditions or fiscal needs.
  • Expertise and Efficiency: Private ownership or market-based management is often argued to be more efficient and innovative than state control.
  • Political Risk: Mandatory referendums could allow political opposition or special interest groups to block necessary economic reforms or sales that might be in the long-term national interest.

Relevant Context

Under current New Zealand law, the government has the authority to manage and dispose of state assets through existing legislation, such as the State Owned Enterprises Act 1986. There is no legal requirement for a referendum on the sale of specific assets unless a general constitutional change is made. The petition seeks to alter this framework by adding a specific democratic check. This issue affects all New Zealanders, as the proceeds from asset sales often go into the national budget, while the loss of the asset itself impacts future public services and infrastructure ownership. According to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE), the government regularly reviews the performance and ownership structure of state-owned entities to ensure they meet their objectives.

Sign on parliament.nz →

Community verdict

1 support · 1 oppose

⚔ Battles (7 days each)

winner: Iona Clarke
👍 ForIona Clarke
We sell the house, then rent it back, then complain about the landlord. At what point do we admit the referendum isn't the problem — the problem is we keep electing people who think 'public' means 'temporarily not private'.
6 votes
6 : 2
👎 AgainstDavid K.
The house analogy is cute but wrong — we don't sell the house, we sell a 30-year lease on the spare bedroom, and the rent pays for the mortgage. Asset sales have funded hospitals and schools that tax revenue alone couldn't build. The real problem isn't the sale, it's that nobody trusts the government to reinvest the proceeds.
2 votes
winner: Iona Clarke
👍 ForIona Clarke
We sell the house, then rent it back, then complain about the landlord. At what point do we admit the referendum isn't the problem — the problem is we keep electing people who think 'public' means 'temporarily not private'.
5 votes
5 : 3
👎 AgainstDavid K.
The house analogy is cute but wrong — we don't sell the house, we sell a 30-year lease on the spare bedroom, and the rent pays for the mortgage. Asset sales have funded hospitals and schools that tax revenue alone couldn't build. The real problem isn't the sale, it's that nobody trusts the government to reinvest the proceeds.
3 votes

Community arguments

👍 For Iona Clarke 2 Oct 2026
Every asset sale is a one-time sugar rush. We spend the capital and call it income.
👎 Against David K. 1 Oct 2026
The government sold Air NZ and it's now one of the best-performing airlines in the world. Sometimes selling is the right call.
👍 For Iona Clarke 27 Sept 2026
We sell the house, then rent it back, then complain about the landlord. At what point do we admit the referendum isn't the problem — the problem is we keep electing people who think 'public' means 'temporarily not private'.
👎 Against David K. 27 Sept 2026
Referendums are expensive and low-turnout. That's why we elect representatives to make these calls.
👎 Against David K. 22 Sept 2026
The house analogy is cute but wrong — we don't sell the house, we sell a 30-year lease on the spare bedroom, and the rent pays for the mortgage. Asset sales have funded hospitals and schools that tax revenue alone couldn't build. The real problem isn't the sale, it's that nobody trusts the government to reinvest the proceeds.
Advertisement
Sidebar / footer ad slot - paste AdSense code here