Advertisement
Top banner ad slot - paste AdSense code here

Release the names of people referred to in the Kitteridge report

Open 6 official signatures 📡 RSS feed

Petition request

That the House of Representatives require the release of the names of the 88 people referred to in the 2013 report of Rebecca Kitteridge into compliance at the GCSB.

Why this petition

I believe I was spied on by my own government! When the case of Kim Dotcom made headlines, I think I was caught in a web of illegal surveillance. I strongly believe that I am one of the 88 people referred to in the Kitteridge report. I am not only concerned about my personal privacy, but about a larger issue that I believe affects every single citizen of New Zealand.

📖 Background

Click to see details

What is the Topic?

This petition concerns the GCSB (Government Communications Security Bureau), New Zealand’s signals intelligence agency. In 2013, an independent review led by Rebecca Kitteridge found that the GCSB had breached its legal powers by intercepting communications of 88 New Zealanders. The report recommended releasing the names of these individuals to ensure accountability. The petitioners want Parliament to force the government to disclose these names.

Current Situation

The Kitteridge Report was released in 2013. While the government accepted many recommendations, it has not released the specific names of the 88 people, citing national security and privacy concerns. The petition’s author claims they were among those spied on during the high-profile Kim Dotcom case (Operation Hail Mary), where the GCSB was found to have illegally intercepted data. The author argues that without knowing who was targeted, citizens cannot verify if they were affected or seek redress.

Arguments in Favour

  • Accountability: Releasing names would allow affected individuals to know their rights were violated and potentially seek compensation or legal review.
  • Transparency: It would demonstrate that the government is committed to upholding the rule of law and respecting privacy rights, even when mistakes are made.
  • Public Trust: Knowing who was targeted helps the public assess the scale and nature of the surveillance overreach.

Arguments Against

  • Privacy of Others: Releasing names could inadvertently reveal sensitive personal information or associate individuals with criminal investigations or political views, causing harm.
  • National Security: The government argues that disclosing specific targets could compromise ongoing security operations or reveal methods used by the GCSB.
  • Legal Precedent: The government has stated that the Kitteridge Report’s recommendations were advisory, and it has already taken steps to reform GCSB oversight without releasing individual names.

Relevant Context

New Zealand’s surveillance powers are governed by the Government Communications Security Bureau Act 2003. The Kitteridge Report highlighted gaps in oversight, leading to increased scrutiny of the GCSB. In 2014, the government established a new oversight body, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security, to monitor GCSB activities. However, the specific issue of releasing the 88 names remains unresolved. The petition reflects broader public concern about the balance between national security and individual privacy rights in the digital age.

Sign on parliament.nz →

Community verdict

1 support · 1 oppose

Advertisement
Sidebar / footer ad slot - paste AdSense code here