Advertisement
Top banner ad slot - paste AdSense code here

10% wage premium on Accredited Employer Work Visas

Open 12 official signatures 📡 RSS feed

Petition request

That the House of Representatives require employers hiring migrants on an Accredited Employer Work Visa to pay a minimum of 10% above the industry market rate.

Why this petition

I suggest that a 10% premium on work visas would prevent employers from using migrant labour as a cheaper alternative to domestic workers, protecting Kiwi jobs. When businesses choose overseas staff, I believe the state continues paying Jobseeker Support to locals without work. I argue that this premium would eliminate unnecessary welfare spending, stop local wage suppression, and create a financial incentive for companies to recruit, train, and upskill New Zealand citizens and residents first.

📖 Background

Click to see details

What is the Topic?

This petition asks the government to change the rules for the Accredited Employer Work Visa (AEWV). Currently, employers must pay migrant workers at least the median wage for their role. The petition requests that employers instead pay a minimum of 10% above the standard market rate. The goal is to make hiring overseas workers more expensive, encouraging businesses to hire New Zealanders first.

Current Situation

New Zealand has faced significant labour shortages in recent years, particularly in construction, healthcare, and hospitality. To address this, the government introduced the AEWV in 2023, replacing several older visa categories. According to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE), the visa system is designed to help accredited employers fill genuine skill gaps when suitable local candidates are unavailable. However, some critics argue that the current wage thresholds are not high enough to prevent businesses from preferring cheaper foreign labour over local workers, leading to ongoing unemployment among Kiwis.

Arguments in Favour

  • Protecting Local Jobs: A wage premium would make it financially unattractive for employers to hire migrants if a local worker is available for less.
  • Reducing Welfare Costs: Proponents argue that if local workers are employed, the government spends less on Jobseeker Support and other welfare benefits.
  • Upskilling Incentive: Higher costs for migrant labour would push companies to invest in training and upskilling their existing New Zealand staff.

Arguments Against

  • Labour Shortages: Opponents, including many business groups, argue that New Zealand does not have enough local workers to fill all vacancies. A 10% premium could make it impossible for businesses to hire the staff they need, potentially stalling projects and economic growth.
  • Cost of Living: Higher labour costs are often passed on to consumers, potentially increasing prices for goods and services and contributing to inflation.
  • Market Distortion: Critics suggest that wages should be determined by market supply and demand, not by a government-imposed penalty on hiring foreigners.

Relevant Context

The AEWV is part of a broader immigration policy shift aimed at attracting high-skilled migrants. Currently, the wage threshold is set at the median wage for the specific role, which is reviewed annually. The petition targets the House of Representatives, meaning it seeks a legislative change rather than just a policy adjustment. This issue is highly debated in New Zealand, with unions generally supporting stricter protections for local workers, while business chambers often advocate for flexible immigration rules to maintain competitiveness.

Sign on parliament.nz →

Community verdict

1 support · 1 oppose

Advertisement
Sidebar / footer ad slot - paste AdSense code here