Increase length of sentences for sexual offences against children

Open 160,068 official signatures 📡 RSS feed

Petition request

That the House of Representatives legislate to make life imprisonment the maximum for sexual violation, raise maximums for sexual offences against children and for child sexual abuse material, set minimum prison terms with no home detention for that material, and require two-thirds to be served.

Why this petition

Sexual violation carries a maximum of 20 years; there is no life sentence for the rape of a child. Sexual connection with a young person under 16 carries 10 years; with a dependent family member under 18, 7. Courts regularly impose home detention for child sexual abuse material offences; those imprisoned for over two years are parole eligible after one third. In October 2025 Parliament lifted the penalty for sexual connection with a child under 12 to 20 years, equal to adult rape.

📖 Background

Click to see details

What This Petition Is About

This petition asks the New Zealand Parliament to change laws regarding punishments for sexual crimes involving children. It proposes making life imprisonment the maximum penalty for "sexual violation" (the legal term for rape) when the victim is a child. It also seeks higher maximum sentences for other sexual offences against children and for possessing or distributing child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Additionally, it requests mandatory minimum prison terms for CSAM offences, banning home detention for these crimes, and requiring offenders to serve two-thirds of their sentence before being eligible for parole.

Current Situation

Currently, the maximum penalty for sexual violation is 20 years, regardless of the victim's age. There is no provision for life imprisonment for the rape of a child. For sexual connection with a person under 16, the maximum penalty is 10 years; for a dependent family member under 18, it is 7 years. Courts have discretion to impose home detention for some CSAM offences. Generally, prisoners serving sentences over two years become eligible for parole after serving one-third of their term. In October 2025, Parliament already increased the maximum penalty for sexual connection with a child under 12 to 20 years, aligning it with the penalty for adult rape.

Arguments in Favour

Proportionality: Supporters argue that the current maximums do not reflect the severe harm caused to children, particularly in cases of rape.
Deterrence: Stricter penalties and mandatory minimums are seen as necessary to deter potential offenders.
Public Safety: Requiring two-thirds of a sentence to be served and banning home detention for CSAM offences aims to keep dangerous individuals in prison longer.

Arguments Against

Judicial Discretion: Critics argue that mandatory minimums remove judges' ability to consider the specific circumstances of each case, potentially leading to unjust outcomes.
Prison Capacity: Longer sentences and mandatory imprisonment could strain New Zealand’s prison system, which is already facing capacity issues.
Effectiveness: Some legal experts and criminologists argue that longer sentences do not necessarily reduce crime rates and may not address the root causes of offending.

Relevant Context

This petition follows recent legislative changes in October 2025, where Parliament already increased penalties for sexual connection with children under 12. The debate often centres on balancing community safety and justice for victims with the practical limits of the criminal justice system. The petition specifically targets the gap between adult and child victim penalties in the most serious sexual offences.

⚡ Cached from a previous visit

Sign on parliament.nz →

Community verdict

3 support · 2 oppose

Community arguments

👎 Against Hara Yomiko 9 Oct 2026

I totally understand where this come from, but If a legal system assigns its absolute highest penalty (such as life imprisonment) to a crime that does not involve murder, it inadvertently creates a perverse incentive for the offender. If the penalty for child sexual violation is identical to the penalty for murder, an offender may rationally conclude that they face no additional legal punishment for killing the victim to eliminate the only witness and escape detection.

👎 Against Mei L. 19 Sept 2026

Raising maximums sounds strong but increases rarely translate into longer actual sentences, and they push victims toward trial when a guilty plea might have spared them reliving it. We need reform, not symbolism.

👍 For Ben H. 18 Sept 2026

Twenty years for the rape of a child while murder gets life sends a signal that the worst harm done to a child isn't treated seriously. The maximums need to reflect the reality of the crime.