Advertisement
Top banner ad slot - paste AdSense code here

Suspend the AEWV maximum continuous stay and 12-month stand down requirements

Open 241 official signatures 📡 RSS feed

Petition request

That the House of Representatives urge the Government to suspend the Maximum Continuous Stay and 12 months stand down period for Accredited Employer Work Visa holders.

Why this petition

Migrant workers on AEWVs must leave NZ after 3 or 5 years due to these rules. Due to current economic conditions, migrant workers may suffer job losses, debt and job instability. We believe: the policies penalize workers in the construction, healthcare & hospitality sectors; employers will lose skilled staff and workers face hardship; the rules are unfair, harm migrant workers, disrupt industries, and have negative economic & social impacts. We seek the review and suspension of these policies.

📖 Background

Click to see details

What is the AEWV?

The Accredited Employer Work Visa (AEWV) is a temporary work visa in New Zealand. It allows employers to hire overseas workers for specific roles. Currently, these visas have strict time limits. Most holders can stay for a maximum of three years. If the job is on the Green List (high-demand roles), the limit is five years. After this period, the worker must leave New Zealand for at least 12 months before they can apply for another AEWV. This is known as the "stand-down" period.

Current Situation

This petition arises from concerns about labor shortages in key sectors like construction, healthcare, and hospitality. According to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE), these industries often struggle to fill roles with domestic workers. The petitioners argue that the current rules force skilled workers to leave, creating instability for both employees and employers during a period of economic adjustment.

Arguments in Favour

  • Economic Stability: Suspending the time limits would allow businesses to retain experienced staff, reducing recruitment costs and training time.
  • Worker Welfare: Workers would avoid the financial hardship of relocating, losing housing, and facing debt while abroad.
  • Industry Continuity: Sectors with chronic shortages would benefit from a stable workforce, preventing project delays and service gaps.

Arguments Against

  • Permanent Migration Pressure: Critics argue that removing time limits effectively turns a temporary visa into a de facto permanent residency pathway, bypassing the intended migration caps.
  • Wage Suppression: There is a concern that an unlimited supply of temporary workers could suppress wages for New Zealand citizens and residents.
  • Policy Intent: The AEWV is designed to be a temporary solution for specific skill gaps, not a long-term settlement route. Changing this undermines the structure of the immigration system.

Relevant Context

The AEWV replaced the old Essential Skills Work Visa in October 2023. The government introduced these time limits to ensure that temporary work visas do not become a backdoor to permanent residency. However, recent reports from industry bodies suggest that the 12-month stand-down period is causing significant disruption. The petition asks the House of Representatives to urge the Government to pause these specific rules, not to abolish the visa category entirely. This is a policy debate balancing immediate economic needs against long-term immigration management goals.

Sign on parliament.nz →

Community arguments

👍 For Suki B. 13 Oct 2026
A system that forces workers to leave the country after a set time, regardless of their contribution or their employer's need, isn't flexibility — it's a revolving door that trains people and loses them.
Advertisement
Sidebar / footer ad slot - paste AdSense code here